One of the things I’ve valued most about being involved in GRACE is the opportunity to see healthcare through a different lens. It hasn’t changed my belief that healthcare professionals want the very best for their patients. If anything, it has reinforced it.<\/p>\n
Recently, I found myself reflecting on this during discussions about a proposed change to a clinical pathway.<\/p>\n
A change in equipment means that a treatment procedure now takes considerably longer than it did previously. To address this, it was suggested that an assessment appointment should be introduced to complete some of the preparation work in advance. However, there was debate about whether this should be a separate appointment or incorporated into the consent consultation to reduce the number of hospital visits for patients.<\/p>\n
On the surface, combining the appointments felt sensible. If a patient is already coming to clinic, why ask them to make another journey?<\/p>\n
Before my involvement in GRACE, I may not have appreciated the full impact this approach could have from a patient’s perspective, and I may not have challenged this suggestion as strongly.<\/p>\n
This experience reminded me that even when healthcare professionals are acting with the very best intentions, we should be cautious about assuming we know how patients will experience a service. The only way to truly understand what matters to patients is to ask them.<\/p>\n
The proposed assessment involved a vaginal examination. These examinations require sensitivity, trust and compassion. They can leave patients feeling vulnerable and may require emotional preparation, particularly when discussions relate to the long-term effects of cancer treatment.<\/p>\n
When I considered the situation from a patient’s perspective, I began to question whether combining the examination with a consent appointment was truly reducing burden. Patients could be asked to absorb complex information, make decisions about treatment, sign consent documentation and undergo an intimate examination\u2014all during the same encounter.<\/p>\n
As healthcare professionals, we have to think about efficiency, capacity and making the best use of limited resources. Those considerations matter. However, patients experience healthcare through the emotions they feel, the conversations they have and the information they are trying to process.<\/p>\n
Sometimes what looks helpful from our perspective can feel overwhelming from theirs.<\/p>\n
I truly believe that healthcare staff act in what they believe are their patients’ best interests.<\/p>\n
Sadly though, we often forget to ask.<\/p>\n
What I found particularly encouraging in this situation was the response when this perspective was shared. Rather than focusing solely on efficiency, management listened. They recognised the value of considering the pathway through a patient’s eyes and gave genuine thought to what patients might be asked to manage during that appointment.<\/p>\n
As a result, the decision was made to introduce the additional assessment appointment.<\/p>\n
For me, that outcome demonstrates the value of linking research and clinical practice. My involvement in GRACE exposed me to patient perspectives that challenged my own assumptions, and those insights directly influenced a real-world service decision. It is a simple but powerful example of how research can improve services\u2014not by sitting in journals or reports, but by helping us better understand the people we care for.<\/p>\n
Most importantly, it reminded me that while healthcare professionals act in what they believe are their patients’ best interests, the only way to know what matters most to patients is to ask them. Sometimes the simplest questions lead to the most meaningful improvements.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" One of the things I’ve valued most about being involved in GRACE is the opportunity to see healthcare through a different lens. It hasn’t changed my belief that healthcare professionals want the very best for their patients. If anything, it has reinforced it. Recently, I found myself reflecting on this during discussions about a proposed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2046,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2046"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=503"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":508,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/503\/revisions\/508"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/grace\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}