{"id":9,"date":"2018-05-03T13:25:11","date_gmt":"2018-05-03T13:25:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/?page_id=9"},"modified":"2018-05-17T09:07:23","modified_gmt":"2018-05-17T09:07:23","slug":"home","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/","title":{"rendered":"Home"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In this Royal Society of Edinburgh funded project, we have\u00a0established an inter-diciplinary, multi-jurisdictional Network of researchers and practitioners with an active interest in the issue of claims of conscience in healthcare and\u00a0a commitment to accommodating these claims in some circumstances. The aim of the Network is to explore persisting questions about the accommodation of conscience in the healthcare context. These include questions about the justification, role, parameters, and legal protection of claims of conscience in healthcare.<\/p>\n<p>There is a huge and growing academic literature on conscience in healthcare (and beyond), encompassing a wide diversity of views. Much of this literature reflects fundamental disagreement about whether claims of conscience should <em>ever<\/em> be permitted and\/or protected in the healthcare context. While this debate is important, it is also important that intellectual space should exist within which those who broadly agree about the desirability of accommodating <em>at least some<\/em>\u00a0claims of conscience, can explore fundamental questions and test new\/speculative arguments, against a background of shared basic premises.\u00a0ACoRN members agree the \u2018basic premise\u2019 that, for the purposes of the project at least, claims of conscience merit <em>some<\/em>\u00a0form of legal protection in <em>some<\/em> circumstances (though we may disagree about what form the protection should take, and what the relevant circumstances are).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"69\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/home\/image001-1\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2018\/05\/image001-1.jpg?fit=150%2C160&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"150,160\" data-comments-opened=\"0\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"image001 (1)\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2018\/05\/image001-1.jpg?fit=150%2C160&amp;ssl=1\" class=\"alignnone  wp-image-69\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2018\/05\/image001-1.jpg?resize=288%2C308&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" width=\"288\" height=\"308\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this Royal Society of Edinburgh funded project, we have\u00a0established an inter-diciplinary, multi-jurisdictional Network of researchers and practitioners with an active interest in the issue of claims of conscience in healthcare and\u00a0a commitment to accommodating these claims in some circumstances. The aim of the Network is to explore persisting questions about the accommodation of conscience [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"nosidebar-page.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P9SLY9-9","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":17,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/links\/","url_meta":{"origin":9,"position":0},"title":"Links","author":"strongs","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Relevant outputs by project team members M Neal, \u2018Conscientious Objection, \u201cProper Medical Treatment\u201d, and Professionalism: The Limits of Accommodation for Conscience in Healthcare\u2019 in J. Adenitire (ed) Religious Beliefs and Conscientious Exemptions in a Liberal State (Hart Publishing, 2019). S Fovargue, S McGuinness, A Mullock, S Smith, 'Conscience and proper\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":13,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/project-update-and-outputs\/","url_meta":{"origin":9,"position":1},"title":"Project update and outputs","author":"strongs","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Roundtables As part of the Network, four roundtables will be held between March 2018 and March 2020, exploring the 'what', 'why', 'how' and the 'when and where' of accommodating claims of conscience in healthcare practice. Within our\u00a0roundtable format, key contributors will present arguments, thoughts, case studies etc, for discussion and\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":145,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/events\/roundtable-1-strathclyde-march-2018-what-mapping-the-contours-of-clinical-judgement-best-interests-and-judgments-of-conscience\/","url_meta":{"origin":9,"position":2},"title":"Roundtable 1, Strathclyde, March 2018 &#8211; \u2018What?\u2019 Mapping the contours of clinical judgement, best interests, and judgements of conscience","author":"strongs","date":"April 2, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"In this roundtable we will explore the \u2018what\u2019 of conscience in healthcare by asking what the role of conscience is in healthcare practice, and how judgements of conscience overlap with, and differ from, 'other' types of professional judgement, particularly clinical judgement (judgements involving the exercise of technical medical skill) and\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":39,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/events\/","url_meta":{"origin":9,"position":3},"title":"Events","author":"strongs","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Roundtable 1, Strathclyde, March 2018 - \u2018What?\u2019 Mapping the contours of clinical judgement, best interests, and judgements of conscience This roundtable will explore the \u2018what\u2019 of conscience in healthcare by asking what the role of conscience is in healthcare practice, and how judgements of conscience overlap with, and differ from,\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":177,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/events\/roundtable-2-cardiff-november-2018-why-exploring-healthcare-as-a-special-case-what-is-it-about-the-healthcare-context-that-makes-it-appropriate-or-necessary-t\/","url_meta":{"origin":9,"position":4},"title":"Roundtable 2, Cardiff, November 2018 &#8211; \u2018Why?\u2019 Exploring healthcare as a \u2018special case\u2019: What is it about the healthcare context that makes it appropriate or necessary to allow conscientious objection?","author":"Sara Fovargue","date":"May 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"This roundtable will explore why healthcare professionals should be able to withdraw from participation in certain work-related activities when professionals working in other areas (for example marriage registrars and social workers) cannot. Is there something distinctive about healthcare, or about the interventions where conscientious objection applies, that justifies the treatment\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":133,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/blog\/","url_meta":{"origin":9,"position":5},"title":"Blog","author":"Sara Fovargue","date":"March 29, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Conscientious Objection at the European Court of Human Rights Are cases concerning conscientious objection in the context of healthcare treated as \u2018special cases\u2019? This was the key question for discussion at the ACoRN Roundtable 2 in Cardiff in November 2018, at which I was invited to present a paper. In\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9\/revisions\/48"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}