{"id":145,"date":"2019-04-02T14:02:10","date_gmt":"2019-04-02T14:02:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/?page_id=145"},"modified":"2019-11-05T09:02:34","modified_gmt":"2019-11-05T09:02:34","slug":"roundtable-1-strathclyde-march-2018-what-mapping-the-contours-of-clinical-judgement-best-interests-and-judgments-of-conscience","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/events\/roundtable-1-strathclyde-march-2018-what-mapping-the-contours-of-clinical-judgement-best-interests-and-judgments-of-conscience\/","title":{"rendered":"Roundtable 1, Strathclyde, March 2018 – \u2018What?\u2019 Mapping the contours of clinical judgement, best interests, and judgements of conscience"},"content":{"rendered":"

In this roundtable we will explore the \u2018what\u2019 of conscience in healthcare by asking what the role of conscience is in healthcare practice, and how judgements of conscience overlap with, and differ from, ‘other’ types of professional judgement, particularly clinical judgement (judgements involving the exercise of technical medical skill) and best interests assessments. What are judgements of conscience? How do judgements of conscience feature in clinicians\u2019 practice? How do they overlap with, and how are they distinct from, other sorts of judgement in professional decision-making? Is it accurate\/helpful to think of cases involving futility in terms of \u2018professional conscience\u2019?<\/p>\n

Programme<\/span><\/h2>\n

9.15 Welcome and introduction to the project, Dr Mary Neal (Strathclyde).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

9.30 Session 1<\/em><\/p>\n

Dr Stephen Smith (Cardiff), \u2018Individual Claims of Conscience and the Doctor\u2019s Decision-making’.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Professor Jose Miola (Leicester), ‘Curtailing Conscience: Values, Patient Autonomy and the Role of Regulation<\/a>‘.<\/p>\nhttps:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2019\/05\/Prof.-Jos\u00e9-Miola.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

 <\/p>\n

Roundtable discussion<\/em>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

11.00 Tea and coffee<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

11.30 Session 2<\/em><\/p>\n

Professor Celia Kitzinger (Independent scholar), ‘Conscientious objection and withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration from non-capacitous patients who are not “actively dying”‘.<\/p>\n

Dr Paul McConnell (Glasgow), ‘Conscientious objection<\/a>‘.<\/p>\nhttps:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2019\/05\/Dr.-Paul-McConnell-1.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

Roundtable discussion<\/em>.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

13.00 Themes and Reflection<\/em>, Professor Bobbie Farsides (Brighton and Sussex Medical School).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

13.15 Lunch<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

14.00 Session 3<\/em><\/p>\n

Dr Agomoni Ganguli-Mitra and Dr Emily Postan (Edinburgh), ‘What is worth protecting in conscientious objection?’<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Dr Isra Black (York), ‘Closeness, conscience and best interests<\/a>‘.<\/p>\nhttps:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2019\/05\/Dr.-Isra-Black.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

 <\/p>\n

Dr Lisa Forsberg (Oxford), ‘Conscience claims, clinical judgements, and judgements about prudential value\u2019.<\/p>\nhttps:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2019\/05\/Dr.-Lisa-Forsberg.mp3<\/a><\/audio>\n

 <\/p>\n

Roundtable discussion.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

16.00 Final Reflection<\/em>, Bobbie Farsides.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In this roundtable we will explore the \u2018what\u2019 of conscience in healthcare by asking what the role of conscience is in healthcare practice, and how judgements of conscience overlap with, and differ from, ‘other’ types of professional judgement, particularly clinical judgement (judgements involving the exercise of technical medical skill) and best interests assessments. What are […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":0,"parent":39,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-145","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P9SLY9-2l","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":39,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/events\/","url_meta":{"origin":145,"position":0},"title":"Events","author":"strongs","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Roundtable 1, Strathclyde, March 2018 - \u2018What?\u2019 Mapping the contours of clinical judgement, best interests, and judgements of conscience This roundtable will explore the \u2018what\u2019 of conscience in healthcare by asking what the role of conscience is in healthcare practice, and how judgements of conscience overlap with, and differ from,\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":183,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/events\/roundtable-3-manchester-june-2019-how-exploring-the-options-for-effecting-protection-providing-for-conscience-in-law-and-professional-guidance\/","url_meta":{"origin":145,"position":1},"title":"Roundtable 3, Manchester, June 2019 – \u2018How?\u2019 Exploring the options for effecting protection: providing for conscience in law and professional guidance\u00a0","author":"Sara Fovargue","date":"May 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"In this roundtable we will explore the \u2018how\u2019 of accommodating conscience in healthcare and consider the advantages, disadvantages, and practical considerations associated with providing for conscientious objection in law and\/or professional guidance. Who should be responsible for regulating\/protecting conscientious objection? What form should regulation\/protection take? Does existing law strike the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":13,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/project-update-and-outputs\/","url_meta":{"origin":145,"position":2},"title":"Project update and outputs","author":"strongs","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Roundtables As part of the Network, four roundtables will be held between March 2018 and March 2020, exploring the 'what', 'why', 'how' and the 'when and where' of accommodating claims of conscience in healthcare practice. Within our\u00a0roundtable format, key contributors will present arguments, thoughts, case studies etc, for discussion and\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":177,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/events\/roundtable-2-cardiff-november-2018-why-exploring-healthcare-as-a-special-case-what-is-it-about-the-healthcare-context-that-makes-it-appropriate-or-necessary-t\/","url_meta":{"origin":145,"position":3},"title":"Roundtable 2, Cardiff, November 2018 – \u2018Why?\u2019 Exploring healthcare as a \u2018special case\u2019: What is it about the healthcare context that makes it appropriate or necessary to allow conscientious objection?","author":"Sara Fovargue","date":"May 23, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"This roundtable will explore why healthcare professionals should be able to withdraw from participation in certain work-related activities when professionals working in other areas (for example marriage registrars and social workers) cannot. Is there something distinctive about healthcare, or about the interventions where conscientious objection applies, that justifies the treatment\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":17,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/links\/","url_meta":{"origin":145,"position":4},"title":"Links","author":"strongs","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Relevant outputs by project team members M Neal, \u2018Conscientious Objection, \u201cProper Medical Treatment\u201d, and Professionalism: The Limits of Accommodation for Conscience in Healthcare\u2019 in J. Adenitire (ed) Religious Beliefs and Conscientious Exemptions in a Liberal State (Hart Publishing, 2019). S Fovargue, S McGuinness, A Mullock, S Smith, 'Conscience and proper\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":9,"url":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/","url_meta":{"origin":145,"position":5},"title":"Home","author":"strongs","date":"May 3, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"In this Royal Society of Edinburgh funded project, we have\u00a0established an inter-diciplinary, multi-jurisdictional Network of researchers and practitioners with an active interest in the issue of claims of conscience in healthcare and\u00a0a commitment to accommodating these claims in some circumstances. The aim of the Network is to explore persisting questions\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/files\/2018\/05\/image001-1.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/36"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=145"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":333,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/145\/revisions\/333"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/39"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acorn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}