![\"Latour,](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/acadswriting\/files\/2015\/02\/Janus.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nLatour, 1987: p. 12<\/p>\n
\n
Academics\u2019 various writing practices are central to the enterprise of Higher Education. The changing landscape of the contemporary academy places texts of various sorts at the centre of academics\u2019 professional writing. This is markedly more pertinent with changes such as internationalisation, the Research Excellence Framework, and digitisation in the work practices of academics. What, therefore, does it mean to be<\/em> an academic and to be doing<\/em> academic work? And what background architectures, practices of different life-worlds, habitualised behaviours, administrative diktats and technological usages all together shape (through either constraining or upholding) the doing<\/em> and being<\/em> of academics\u2019 writing?<\/p>\n That knowledge is \u2018produced\u2019 suggests a maker or producer and even a recipe. In my other work<\/a> I have drawn from the sociology of actor-network to provide an account of how student work is done. In this framing we can turn to words like \u2018perform\u2019 or \u2018enact\u2019, and see knowledge as emergent in practices rather than a sole and unitary object with a sole and unitary producer.<\/p>\n Performativity, in this way, also leads us to the politics of what version of knowledge (i.e. an output) is lead\/forced\/encouraged to emerge as ostensibly the<\/i> knowledge that we commonly see and hear about (e.g. a published paper, or media coverage reporting on a research publication). An assemblage of conventions, practices, norms, protocols, rules, etc holds this version in place, often precariously. The construction and performance of knowledge creation also leads us to look at the relationships readers of academics’ writing and beneficiaries of \u2018impact\u2019 etc. have with these knowledges.<\/p>\n Universities and their workers (\u2018academics\u2019) will be approached much the same way as an anthropologist would a tribe . A detailed observational account of the settings will be conducted via ethnography, with a focus on the routine and mundane as we enter and explore the babel of disciplines before us. Here we will provide an account of the different professional milieux and the information and material environments which give rise to writing practices and give them their unique character.<\/p>\n As part of a more situational exploration of work \u2018as it happens\u2019, we will also carry out contemporaneous and in situ monitoring of academics\u2019 writing through screencast recording alongside Livescribe<\/em> capturing of note-writing.<\/p>\n As you can probably tell, this is going to be a fascinating research project and we are actively seeking academics from three disciplinary sites each within three HE institutions in the northwest of England. In each University we will work in three different disciplinary areas: STEM, social sciences\/humanities, and professional\/applied programmes. This will enable us to sample across a range of writing practices both across disciplines and institutions, and within them.<\/p>\n We are at a stage where we hope to establish our research sites and would like to hear from you if you are interested in being on board as one of the nine units of research sites. There will be more posts emerging as the project gets started with further details, but please do not hesitate to contact me on i.bhatt@lancaster.ac.uk<\/a> if you would like to be involved in this project.<\/p>\n Best wishes<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n