{"id":1098,"date":"2019-11-01T13:17:33","date_gmt":"2019-11-01T13:17:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/?p=1098"},"modified":"2019-12-16T18:49:25","modified_gmt":"2019-12-16T18:49:25","slug":"special-feature-lancaster-university-students-disunion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/2019\/11\/01\/special-feature-lancaster-university-students-disunion\/","title":{"rendered":"SPECIAL FEATURE: LANCASTER UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ DISUNION"},"content":{"rendered":"
SPECIAL FEATURE: LANCASTER UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ DISUNION<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Contributed articles by Ronnie Rowlands<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
ONE SUGAR, PLEASE<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
When we covered the Students’ Union officer elections for the 19\/20 academic year, your subtext correspondents observed that the new crop of officers ought to make short work of becoming popular. LUSU had been awash with scandal (sometimes justifiable, sometimes not), including the cancellation of Grad Ball, the Snowsports white t-shirt social and the initial decision (rapidly reversed) to officially recognise a society for literal, self-avowed fascists. The combustible elements lit up into a conflagration when a visceral outpouring of rage followed the decision to strip student radio station, Bailrigg FM, of its FM license and reduce its funding. The officers-elect were quick to promise that they would reverse this decision if the then-current officers did not. The decision was reversed before they took office, and all that the new officers – George Nuttall, Grishma Bijukumar, Ben Evans, Lewis Marriott, Bee Morgan and Hannah Prydderch – had to do to elicit a huge voter turnout was to promise to Make LUSU Not Sh*t Again. President Nuttall was already being exalted by Lancaster’s unofficial social media ‘sh*tposting’ pages as the bringer of a shiny new dawn.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Then LUSU announced that its Trustee Board had voted to close and sell the Sugarhouse.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It didn’t take long for the Full Time Officers to distance themselves from the announcement. Some not particularly well-disguised leaks left the student body under no illusion as to who was responsible – the non-student Trustees, plus one ‘rebel’ Full Time Officer whose decisive vote swayed the decision. This Full Time Officer has subsequently found himself ‘un-personed’ by his fellow officers, reviled by a student body that is seeking to remove him from office and doorstepped in the LUSU building by the student media’s TV cameras.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The students weren’t going to let the Sugarhouse go without a fight. And why would they? The Sugarhouse has remained a staple of Lancaster’s dwindling nightlife and enjoys both good and bad financial years. Perhaps more importantly, the Sugarhouse is regarded as a ‘safe night out’ by students, and there should surely be a space for student-led venues to accommodate the cultural, racial, and sexual diversity among our student population.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The wise decision to call a general meeting was taken, and a ‘Save Our Sugarhouse’ motion was duly proposed… along with a pile of others, on issues ranging from affordable housing to climate change.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Yes, seizing the opportunity to bellow at the union officers in front of a huge audience, a group of Labour students set about foisting a comprehensive campaigning agenda on them. The executive couldn’t rely on the meeting becoming inquorate to jettison the motions – with proxy voting now allowed, hundreds of students were able to make their decision before the meeting, arguably making any debate pointless since the motions were already decided.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Nor could the executive hope to run down the clock or suggest that the motions should be considered in a different forum – procedural motion after procedural motion was passed, and the meeting was repeatedly extended, while motions were moved straight to a vote. Those who stayed it out, delighted that they could finally actually mandate their representatives to do something – anything! – duly voted for every single motion.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It will come as no surprise to learn that the motions to save Sugarhouse were passed. The five LUSU Officers who showed up took the opportunity to stress that they personally had voted AGAINST the closure and sale of the Sugarhouse, in a ‘People vs Parliament’ style move that deflected the anger onto the rest of the Trustee Board.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
All in all, the student body finally got to vent some steam, and the groundswell of resentment that has built up over several years may have softened for a while. Whether this was the start of some real steps towards a re-democratised students’ union – which could have prevented some real catastrophes over the last couple of years – or that’s your lot for the next five years, it was heartening to see that the volcano of student anger and rebellion is still active.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
***<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
THE CASE FOR COUNCIL<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
subtext kept a watchful eye on the gutting of LUSU’s accountability structures in 2015. We predicted at the time that culling most of the officers and dissolving the Union Council – which met fortnightly and could be attended by any student (although policy could only be voted on by officers) – and replacing it with unaccountable ‘Student Juries’ would lead to the very vacuum of accountability and engagement that has led to some of LUSU’s more questionable recent decisions.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The Union Council was a great body. It met fortnightly and was comprised of all of the Full Time Officers, all of the College Presidents and Vice-Presidents, all of the Faculty Reps and all of the Part-Time Officers. The membership had the power to propose and vote on policy, but crucially, ALL students could attend and ask questions. At each meeting, the Full Time Officers were required to deliver information and take questions, meaning that they could not escape direct scrutiny in the public eye. The whole point of Union Council was for officers to consult with their respective ‘juniors’ (the Faculty Reps with their Academic Reps, the International Officers with international students and JCR reps, you get the picture…), and to propose and vote on policy with their views in mind. Sadly, the Council became infested with grandstanders who wanted to hold inward-looking discussions about tedious personal grudges and constitutional minutiae. This in turn became ammunition for an executive, who couldn’t be bothered to undergo scrutiny and face the public, to lobby for its abolition.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

Look at the situation LUSU is in now. Can anybody name the last time that the ‘Student Jury’ sat? Do people remember when LUSU introduced a ‘scrutiny panel’, which involved Full Time Officers appointing people to write reports about them that were then buried on the LUSU website? A fortnightly public meeting with the minutes released in a timely way was an ample means of keeping the paranoid headbangers at bay. If anybody said that LUSU was unaccountable, officers could just say ‘we’ve got LUSU Council. Why don’t you show up?’ With no LUSU Council, a Student Jury and a scrutiny panel that never meets, and an Executive committee that doesn’t release its minutes, LUSU’s pressure valves of old are gone. If LUSU wants to return to transparency in any lasting way, it would do wise to reinstate the structures that were so needlessly abolished in 2016.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SPECIAL FEATURE: LANCASTER UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ DISUNION Contributed articles by Ronnie Rowlands ONE SUGAR, PLEASE When we covered the Students’ Union officer elections for the 19\/20 academic year, your subtext correspondents observed that the new crop of officers ought to make … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":568,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21,3],"tags":[528,20,210,491,536],"class_list":["post-1098","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-contributed-article","category-special-feature","tag-issue-190","tag-lusu","tag-protest","tag-ronnie-rowlands","tag-union-council"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p99sHo-hI","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":744,"url":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/2018\/09\/13\/subtext-annual-review-2017-18\/","url_meta":{"origin":1098,"position":0},"title":"SUBTEXT ANNUAL REVIEW: 2017-18","author":"Johnny Unger","date":"September 13 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Letters, contributions, & comments: subtext-editors@lancaster.ac.uk Back issues: http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/about 'Like' us on Facebook: www.facebook.com\/lusubtext To receive subtext via email, subscribe at wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/about In this issue: hello again, appeal for volunteers, reflections and predictions including: printers, Gary Neville, legal action, University Court, attendance monitoring, power grabs, fascism, disabilities, assistant deans, working at\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "editorial"","block_context":{"text":"editorial","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/category\/editorial\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":963,"url":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/2019\/04\/02\/bailrigg-not-fm\/","url_meta":{"origin":1098,"position":1},"title":"BAILRIGG NOT-FM","author":"Johnny Unger","date":"April 2 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"As subtext goes to press, Bailrigg FM's members have been sent an email informing them that Lancaster SU will no longer be supporting the station's FM broadcasting license, something it has held for over 20 years. This would mean the station going online-only from the end of August 2019, and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "contributed article"","block_context":{"text":"contributed article","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/category\/contributed-article\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1270,"url":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/2020\/06\/19\/nuttall-officers\/","url_meta":{"origin":1098,"position":2},"title":"Nuttall Officers","author":"Johnny Unger","date":"June 19 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Contributed article by Ronnie Rowlands Back in those heady, wistful days of February 2020, subtext reported that the students' union (LUSU) had passed a drastic restructure of its executive officer team without adequate consultation. LUSU's reorganisation continues apace, with the sacking of President George Nuttall and the resignation of Vice-President\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "contributed article"","block_context":{"text":"contributed article","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/category\/contributed-article\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1134,"url":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/2019\/06\/28\/another-glorious-victory\/","url_meta":{"origin":1098,"position":3},"title":"ANOTHER GLORIOUS VICTORY","author":"Johnny Unger","date":"June 28 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"Contributed article by Ronnie Rowlands A lot has happened since subtext broke the news of LUSU's decision to strip Bailrigg FM of its FM license, the most significant thing being the decision to continue funding it after all. Bailrigg FM was fortunate that the decision came in the wake of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "contributed article"","block_context":{"text":"contributed article","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/category\/contributed-article\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":842,"url":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/2018\/11\/23\/snow-joke\/","url_meta":{"origin":1098,"position":4},"title":"SNOW JOKE","author":"Johnny Unger","date":"November 23 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Contributed by Ronnie Rowlands. Readers of subtext will have been pleased to learn that Lancaster University is currently enjoying a flurry of coverage in the national press. Has Cary Cooper received another knighthood? Did someone devise a formula for the perfect twerk? 'Students face probe over t-shirts daubed with swastikas.'\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "contributed article"","block_context":{"text":"contributed article","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/category\/contributed-article\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":69,"url":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/2017\/10\/12\/john-hadfield-a-personal-reflection\/","url_meta":{"origin":1098,"position":5},"title":"JOHN HADFIELD – A PERSONAL REFLECTION","author":"Johnny Unger","date":"October 12 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"Written by Ronnie Rowlands. The news of the death of John Hadfield on September 1st came as a great shock. John had been a regular fixture of the university\u2019s decision-making bodies for a number of years, culminating in his service as Deputy Pro-Chancellor of the University. He was never an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "obituary"","block_context":{"text":"obituary","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/category\/obituary\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1098","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/568"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1098"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1098\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1099,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1098\/revisions\/1099"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1098"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1098"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/subtext\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1098"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}