{"id":179,"date":"2016-01-27T12:30:47","date_gmt":"2016-01-27T12:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/?page_id=179"},"modified":"2016-02-09T22:21:31","modified_gmt":"2016-02-09T22:21:31","slug":"event-1-reading-list","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/event-1-reading-list\/","title":{"rendered":"Event 1: Reading List"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Event 1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>General Reading<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Gillian Beer, \u2018Translation or Transformation? The Relations of Literature and Science\u2019, in <em>Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter<\/em> (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 173-95<\/p>\n<p>John Carey, \u2018Introduction\u2019, in <em>The Faber Book of Science<\/em>, ed. by John Carey (London: Faber, 1995), pp. xiii-xxvii<\/p>\n<p>Gowan Dawson, \u2018Literature and Science Under the Microscope\u2019, <em>Journal of Victorian Culture<\/em>, 11 (2006), 301-15<\/p>\n<p>Ralph O&#8217;Connor, \u2018Introduction: Science as Literature\u2019, in <em>The Earth on Show: Fossils and the Poetics of Popular Science, 1802-1856<\/em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007), pp. 1-27<\/p>\n<p>Sharon Ruston, \u2018Introduction\u2019, \u2018Science and Literature\u2019, <em>Essays and Studies<\/em>, 61 (2008), 1-12<\/p>\n<p><strong>Plenary Session 1: \u2018Empiricism and the Novel\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Michel De Montaigne, \u2018Of Cannibals\u2019 (1580)<\/p>\n<p>Primo Levi, \u2018Iron\u2019 (from <em>The Periodic Table<\/em> (1975\/85))<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/12030\/12030-h\/SV1\/Spectator1.html\">Original Dedication<\/a>, The <em>Spectator<\/em>, 1 (1 March 1711)<\/p>\n<p>Thomas Sprat, <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=Y8DOAAAAMAAJ&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Sprat,+Thomas,+History+of+the+Royal+Society&amp;lr=&amp;ei=dHYiS5H8AanUkgTW0-G_Cw&amp;cd=2#v=onepage&amp;q=&amp;f=false\"><em>History of the Royal Society<\/em><\/a> (1667)<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Swift,\u00a0<em>Gulliver\u2019s Travels<\/em>\u00a0(1727)<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Swift, <em>The Battle of the Books <\/em>(1704)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session 1: Gladstone Library Collection<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ruth Clayton Windscheffel,\u00a0<em>Gladstone Reading<\/em> (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2008)<\/p>\n<p>Ruth Clayton Windscheffel, \u2018W. E. Gladstone: An Annotation Key\u2019, <em>Notes and Queries<\/em>, 246 (new series 48), n. 2 (June 2001), 140-43<\/p>\n<p>W. E. Gladstone,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.gutenberg.org\/files\/3426\/3426-h\/3426-h.htm\">&#8216;On Books and the Housing of Them&#8217;<\/a>, <em>Nineteenth Century<\/em>, 27 (March 1890), 384-96<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session 2: Mono-, Inter-, Multi- Disciplinarity<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Stefan Collini, \u2018Introduction\u2019, in C. P. Snow, <em>The Two Cultures<\/em> (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. vii-lxxi<\/p>\n<p>Joe Moran, \u2018Science, Space and Nature\u2019, in <em>Interdisciplinarity<\/em> (New Critical Idiom) (London: Routledge, 2002), pp. 148-81<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session 4: Medical Discoveries and Online Resources\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><u>Outline<\/u><\/p>\n<p>New theories, techniques, and drugs are a fundamental strand of the history of medicine and provide fertile ground for researching a multiplicity of themes and ideas. But we have to take great care not to interpret past discoveries in present-centred terms. Medical innovations are shaped by specific historical and cultural conditions, and critical analysis of the wider context surrounding their discovery is a key part of historical research. The aim of this session is to introduce students to the pleasures and pitfalls of researching medical discoveries through two examples: William Harvey and the circulation of the blood (1643) and the introduction of anaesthesia (late 1840s). Additionally we will explore the potential of online resources for research in this area.<\/p>\n<p><u>Content<\/u><\/p>\n<p>It will be helpful if you have prepared in advance for the session as outlined below.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Read William Harvey, <em>On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals<\/em>: Dedications, Letter to Prince Charles, Introduction, and Chapters 8 and 9. This material can be downloaded from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bartleby.com\/38\/3\">Bartleby.com<\/a>\u00a0or from\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fordham.edu\/halsall\/mod\/1628harvey-blood.html\">The Modern History Source Book<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Use the following questions to structure your reading:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What was the \u2018old\u2019 view, which Harvey came to deny?<\/li>\n<li>What led him to his new view?<\/li>\n<li>How was this view supported and communicated to the world?<\/li>\n<li>Was Harvey a revolutionary?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>Undertake some brief searches on the introduction of anaesthesia in the online journals\/newspapers listed below. Use the search terms: \u2018anaesthesia\u2019, \u2018ether\u2019, and \u2018chloroform\u2019, and search between 1846 and 1860.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/archive.guardian.co.uk\/Default\/Scripting\/SearchHome.asp?Skin=DigitalArchive&amp;AW=1229365092080&amp;AppName=2\"><em>The<\/em> <em>Guardian<\/em> and <em>Observer<\/em> newspapers<\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>The<\/em> <em>Lancet<\/em>\u00a0(1832 to present)<\/p>\n<p><em>Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical Index<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Plenary Lecture 2: \u2018Researching Early Twentieth-Century Literature and the Physical Sciences\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Gillian Beer, \u2018Translation or Transformation? The Relations of Literature and Science\u2019, in <em>Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter <\/em>(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 173-95<\/p>\n<p>Coutts Brisbane, \u2018For the Good of Creation\u2019, <em>Yellow Magazine<\/em>, 19:120 (16 April 1926)<\/p>\n<p>M. A. Laqui, \u2018Death-Rays and Moonshine: Is There a Menace\u2019, <em>Conquest<\/em>, 5:9 (July 1924), 382-83<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session 6: Literature and Science<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Gillian Beer, \u2018Introduction: The Remnant of the Mythical\u2019, in <em>Darwin\u2019s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction<\/em> (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), pp. 3-11<\/p>\n<p>Gillian Beer, \u2018Translation or Transformation? The Relations of Literature and Science\u2019, in <em>Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter<\/em> (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 173-95<\/p>\n<p>Gowan Dawson, \u2018Literature and Science Under the Microscope\u2019, <em>Journal of Victorian Culture<\/em>, 11 (2006), 301-15<\/p>\n<p>George Levine, \u2018One Culture: Science and Literature\u2019, in <em>One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature<\/em>, ed. by George Levine and Alan Rausch (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987), pp. 3-32<\/p>\n<p>Sharon Ruston, \u2018Introduction\u2019, \u2018Science and Literature\u2019, <em>Essays and Studies<\/em>, 61 (2008), 1-12<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session 7: Psychoanalysis, Medicine, and Social Pathology<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This session will focus primarily on Freud\u2019s thought on hypnosis and suggestion, and their postulated role in group formations. These ideas will be contextualised and assessed through a discussion of H. G. Wells\u2019s <em>The Island of Dr Moreau<\/em> and, more widely, in relation to recent debates about the therapeutic efficacy and social impact of psychoanalysis.<\/p>\n<p>Todd Dufresne, <em>Killing Freud: Twentieth-Century Culture and the Death of Psychoanalysis<\/em> (London and New York: Continuum, 2003), pp. vii-xi (Introduction) and 4-25 (\u2018The Strange Case of \u201cAnna O.\u201d: An Overview of the \u201cRevisionist\u201d Assessment\u2019)<\/p>\n<p>Sigmund Freud, \u2018Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego\u2019 (1921)<\/p>\n<p>Elisabeth Roudinesco, <em>Why Psychoanalysis?<\/em>, trans. by Rachel Bowlby (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001), pp. 10-19 (\u2018The Medications of the Mind\u2019) and 41-55 (\u2018Frankenstein\u2019s Brain\u2019)<\/p>\n<p>H. G. Wells, <em>The Island of Dr Moreau<\/em> (1896)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session 8: Evolution Without Darwin<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Smith, \u2018Darwin and the Evolution of Victorian Studies\u2019, <em>Victorian Studies<\/em>, 51:2 (2009), 215-21<\/p>\n<p>Peter J. Bowler, \u2018What Darwin Disturbed: The Biology That Might Have Been\u2019, <em>Isis<\/em>, 99 (2008), 560-67<\/p>\n<p>Jim Endersby, \u2018Escaping Darwin\u2019s Shadow\u2019, <em>Journal of the History of Biology<\/em>, 36 (2003), 385-403<\/p>\n<p>Edmund S. Dixon, <a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?id=G2MJAAAAQAAJ\">\u2018A Vision of Animal Existences\u2019<\/a>, <em>Cornhill Magazine<\/em>, 5 (1862), 311-18<\/p>\n<p>Charles Kingsley, <em><a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?id=IHQ-AAAAYAAJ\">Alton Locke<\/a><\/em> (1850), Chapter 36 (\u2018Dreamland\u2019)<\/p>\n<p>James Secord, <em>Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation<\/em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 4-5, 479-518<\/p>\n<p><strong>Session 9: Literary Darwinism<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>David Amigoni, \u2018A Consilient Canon? Bridges To and From Evolutionary Literary Analysis\u2019, <em>English Studies in Canada<\/em>, 32:2\/3 (2006), 173-85<\/p>\n<p>David Amigoni, \u2018\u201cThe Luxury of Storytelling\u201d: Literature, Science and Cultural Contest in the Narrative Practice of Ian McEwan\u2019, \u2018Science and Literature\u2019, <em>Essays and Studies<\/em>, 61 (2008), 151-67<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan Gottschall and David Sloan Wilson, \u2018Introduction: Literature &#8211; A Last Frontier in Human Evolutionary Studies\u2019, in <em>The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative<\/em> (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2005), pp. xvii-xxvi<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/event-1-programme-and-resources\/\">Back to Event 1 Programme and Resources<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Event 1 General Reading Gillian Beer, \u2018Translation or Transformation? The Relations of Literature and Science\u2019, in Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 173-95 John Carey, \u2018Introduction\u2019, in The Faber Book of Science, ed. by &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/event-1-reading-list\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":456,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-179","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/456"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/179\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":886,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/179\/revisions\/886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/litscimed\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}