{"id":1189,"date":"2025-11-03T11:08:09","date_gmt":"2025-11-03T11:08:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/?page_id=1189"},"modified":"2026-02-03T09:33:14","modified_gmt":"2026-02-03T09:33:14","slug":"phd-and-early-career-researcher-network-archive","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/phd-and-early-career-researcher-network-archive\/","title":{"rendered":"PhD and Early Career Researcher Network archive"},"content":{"rendered":"

Jan to April 2025 SCHEDULE<\/strong><\/p>\n

Theme:\u00a0Local literacies as social practice<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this upcoming series, we will explore key ideas and contributions of Barton\u2019s work in literacy studies through a reading discussion followed by a conversation with Dr. Uta Papen (Lancaster University). Next, we will discuss ethnography and reflexivity in literacy research with Dr. Gunther Dietz (Universidad Veracruzana, M\u00e9xico). Following this, Vickie Barritt (University of Sheffield, UK) will present her research on literacy within the probation service. Building on Vickie\u2019s talk, we will conclude the series with a discussion on literacy education in prison.<\/p>\n

We do hope you can join us for this stimulating and very special series of discussions!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Register<\/strong>:\u00a0You can sign up for our mailing list to receive announcements, including meeting links, by emailing us at:\u00a0LITERACIES-NET-REQUEST@JISCMAIL.AC.UK<\/a>\u00a0 or using the web link:\u00a0https:\/\/www.jiscmail.ac.uk\/cgi-bin\/wa-jisc.exe?A0=LITERACIES-NET<\/a>. This JISCmail list lets you easily opt in or out of announcements, so you won\u2019t receive unwanted emails!<\/p>\n

Day and time<\/strong>: Usually Wednesday 4 pm to 5 pm UK time, but check the schedule below<\/p>\n

Meeting link<\/strong>: Join Zoom Meeting<\/p>\n

https:\/\/uchile.zoom.us\/j\/96221370651?pwd=ieDweGCbOXiDdi6gmF2Tras7zsJfIr.1<\/a><\/p>\n

Access code<\/strong>: literacies<\/p>\n

Are you interested in sharing your work in progress, or leading a text-based discussion for us in the next series?\u00a0Drop us an email at\u00a0s.montessanchez@lancaster.ac.uk<\/a>\u00a0or\u00a0d.b.depauw@leeds.ac.uk<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/strong><\/td>\nSession format<\/strong><\/td>\nTitle\/Topic<\/strong><\/td>\nReading\/abstract<\/strong><\/td>\nFacilitator\/<\/strong><\/p>\n

Speaker\/ Interviewee<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Jan 29th<\/sup> 4pm UK time<\/td>\nReading discussion<\/td>\nData collection and ethnography in Literacy as social practice<\/td>\nDavid Barton, Mary Hamilton, Roz Ivanic, Fiona Ormerod, Sarah Padmore, Simon Pardoe & Rachel Rimmershaw (1994) Photographing Literacy Practices, Changing English, 1:1, 127-140, DOI: 10.1080\/1358684940010110<\/td>\nDenise De Pauw and Soledad Montes (Lancaster University, UK)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
February 4th, <\/sup>4pm UK time<\/td>\nConversation with Uta Papen<\/td>\nLiteracies as social practice: concepts and ideas from Barton\u2019s work<\/td>\nConversation with Dr. Uta Papen. We will delve into key concepts and ideas from David Barton and its influence in Literacy studies and in her own work.<\/td>\nDr. Uta Papen (Lancaster University, UK)<\/p>\n

Facilitator: Soledad Montes (Lancaster University, UK)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

February 25, 2026<\/p>\n

4 \u2013 5 pm<\/span><\/td>\n

Presentation<\/td>\nA Chinese doctoral student\u2019s experience of L2 English academic writing in Australia: Negotiating practices and identities<\/td>\nWang, M., & Parr, G. (2025). Chinese international students negotiating their academic writing and identities in an Anglophone context: A dialogic, decolonising case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 131, 102588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijer.2025.102588<\/a>.<\/td>\nSpeakers: Dr Meihui Wang (Monash University),<\/p>\n

Prof. Graham Parr (Monash University)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

March 19th<\/sup> 4pm UK time<\/td>\nReading discussion<\/td>\nDouble reflexive ethnography<\/td>\nDietz, Gunther and Laura Selene Mateos Cort\u00e9s (2022) Doubly Reflexive Ethnography and Collaborative Research. In: George Noblit (ed.):
\nOxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190264093.013.1709,<\/td>\n		Facilitator: Jessica Franco (Universidad Veracruzana, M\u00e9xico)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
March 26th<\/p>\n

4pm UK time<\/td>\n

Interview with Gunther Dietz<\/td>\nReflexivity and ethnography<\/td>\nConversation with Dr. Gunther Dietz on ethnopgraphy and how to use it to study literacy practices.<\/td>\nDr. Gunther Dietz<\/p>\n

Fascilitator: Jessica Franco and Denise De Pauw<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

April 30th<\/sup> 4pm UK time<\/td>\nPresentation<\/td>\nWhat role does literacy play in criminal justice?<\/td>\nMy curiosity about the role of literacy in the criminal justice system was sparked when my son started school and began learning to read. This curiosity shaped my PhD research project. The study collaborated with a regional Probation Service to explore how probation practitioners consider and respond to literacy needs when delivering criminal justice services. Literacy is a topic rarely discussed in criminal justice research. Yet, it is difficult to comprehend criminology\u2019s absence when \u201creading and writing are central to almost every stage of the [criminal justice] process\u201d (UserVoice, 2021, p. 12). The presentation will explore a new concept developed from the research, and I would welcome your thoughts and feedback on this proposal.<\/td>\nVickie Barritt<\/p>\n

(University of Sheffield, UK)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

May 7th<\/sup> 4pm UK time<\/td>\nReading discussion<\/td>\nLiteracy education in prision<\/td>\nElena Ioannidou, Elisavet Kiourti & Christina Christofidou (2019) Literacy education in prison: developing a social literacy programme in the prison school of Cyprus,<\/p>\n

Research Papers in Education, 34:5, 597-620. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02671522.2018.1524925<\/td>\n

Facilitator: Denise De Pauw<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Earlier events<\/b><\/p>\n

==============================<\/p>\n

MAY-JULY SCHEDULE 2024<\/strong><\/p>\n

Theme: <\/strong>Methodologies, perspectives, and challenges in the study of literacy as social practice<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this short upcoming series, we will dive into a variety of topics including research ethics, the researcher positioning, how methodology shapes both the researcher and the participants as writers, the challenges of ethnographic research, and the pedagogical implications of a social practice approach to the study of literacy. We will also discuss an article co-authored by Dr. Diane Potts (Potts & Cutrim Schmid, 2022), who is a lecturer in linguistics at Lancaster University. We’re delighted to be joined later by Diane for an informal and open interview when we hope to further explore the relevance of a sustained engagement in the site of study and the challenges of a literacy as social practice pedagogy in multilingual environments.<\/p>\n

We do hope you can join us for this stimulating series of discussions!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Register: <\/strong>please register as member here.<\/a>\u00a0 Your registration will allow us to send you the readings PDFs\u00a0 and any last minute updates.<\/p>\n

Day and time<\/strong>: Tuesdays or Fridays 4 pm to 5 pm UK time<\/p>\n

Meeting link<\/strong>: Join Zoom Meeting<\/p>\n

https:\/\/universityofleeds.zoom.us\/j\/86422105898<\/a><\/p>\n

Meeting ID: 864 2210 5898<\/p>\n

Are you interested in sharing your work in progress, or leading a text-based discussion for us in the next series?<\/strong> Drop us an email at s.montessanchez@lancaster.ac.uk<\/a> or d.b.depauw@leeds.ac.uk<\/a>
\n<\/u><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/td>\nSession format<\/td>\nTitle\/Topic<\/td>\nReading\/<\/p>\n

Presentation abstract<\/td>\n

Facilitator\/<\/p>\n

Speaker\/ Interviewee<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

May 21st<\/sup><\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Talk and discussion<\/td>\nWriting in a literary style for research: Using ethnographic fieldnotes<\/td>\nMy research looks very generally at the lives of public schoolteachers who teach English (as a Foreign Language subject) in primary schools in Vietnam. It is an ethnographic study, that spanned one school year. The research was deliberately kept broad to help capture as much life and nuance in the teachers’ daily lives at school as possible (the research questions usually come after in research like this). One of my own aims beginning the research was on how to preserve this life at school. For this, I used ethnographic fieldnotes and deliberately wrote them in a very literary style to help retain the drama, small moments, and my own emotional memories of being there that (to me at least) seemed to characterise much of teachers’ lives at school, on top of their teaching. This presentation will show some examples of my ethnographic fieldnotes and how I try to incorporate them into an academic prose that does not betray the experience of ‘being there’.<\/td>\nThanh Nguyen (University of Stirling, UK)<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

June 28th<\/sup><\/td>\nTalk and discussion<\/td>\nAppropriation of academic writing in young Mexican indigenous researchers<\/td>\nAs part of my dissertation research, which employs a qualitative methodological framework and adopts a collaborative approach, I conducted in-depth interviews with three young indigenous researchers working in the field of intercultural education. Through these interviews, I explored their family backgrounds, academic trajectories, and research journeys, focusing particularly on their experiences with academic writing. Analysis of their narratives reveals that the cultural identity of researchers significantly influences the development of their academic identity. This awareness of their cultural identity enables them to critically appropriate writing and strategically use it to address power dynamics within academic settings. Understanding the intersection between cultural identity and the critical appropriation of academic writing informs the integration of identity into pedagogical approaches aimed at fostering a social justice perspective in teaching academic writing.<\/td>\nJessica Franco (Universidad Veracruzana, M\u00e9xico)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
July 16th<\/td>\nReading discussion<\/td>\nPlurilingual practice in language teacher education<\/td>\nReading discussion based on the following article:<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.jbe-platform.com\/content\/journals\/10.1075\/aila.22007.pot<\/a><\/td>\n

Denise de Pauw & Soledad Montes (network convenors, Lancaster University, UK)<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

July 23rd<\/td>\nInterview<\/td>\nConversation with Diane Potts (Lancaster University)<\/td>\nDiane Potts BIO (coming soon)<\/td>\nDiane Potts (Lancaster University, UK)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Previous schedules<\/p>\n

NOVEMBER-FEBRUARY SCHEDULE 2023<\/strong><\/p>\n

Theme: Diverse approaches to investigate literacy as social practice<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this upcoming series of discussions, we aim to share our perspectives, experiences, and current challenges regarding research on literacy as a social practice. What areas, techniques, or research models are applicable to this approach? What do our members’ research, using a social practice approach to literacy, look like? What are their methodological choices and the subjects they explore? We aim to delve into different research projects that adopt a literacy as a social practice perspective.<\/p>\n

We have scheduled a series of talks, reading discussions, and one interview to be announced soon.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Register: <\/strong>please register as member here.<\/a>\u00a0 Your registration will allow us to send you the Zoom link, readings PDFs \u00a0and any last minute updates.<\/p>\n

Time<\/strong>: 4pm or 3pm UK time (see the exact time for each session). Check your local time here: https:\/\/www.timeanddate.com\/worldclock\/meeting.html<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Are you interested in sharing your work in progress, or leading a text-based discussion for us later in the academic year?<\/strong> Drop us an email at s.montessanchez@lancaster.ac.uk<\/a> or d.b.depauw@leeds.ac.uk<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/td>\nSession format<\/td>\nTitle\/Topic<\/td>\nReading\/Presentation abstract<\/td>\nFacilitator\/Speaker\/ Interviewee<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

November 13th<\/sup> 4pm UK time<\/td>\nTalk<\/td>\nAnalyzing Interaction between Academic and Workplace Writing Practices of Law Undergraduates<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

My project will analyze and contrast the writing practices a group of undergraduate law students engage in at university and their workplace from a sociocultural perspective of literacy. To do so, I will use qualitative methods (interviews, literacy diary, and text analysis). Unlike other similar studies seeking to design pedagogic interventions, I intend to broaden the object of analysis from text to writing practice, to be able to understand all that comes into play when having to produce a text, which text samples alone do not show. Results will show whether or not this institution is training professionals who are prepared to meet the literacy demands of their profession. Also, I am confident that the resulting descriptions will allow me and practitioners to design writing interventions that move the focus away from genre\u2019s superficial features.<\/td>\nHairenik Aramayo Eliazarian, (Universidad Nacional Aut\u00f3noma de M\u00e9xico, UNAM)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
December Monday 11th<\/sup><\/p>\n

4pm<\/td>\n

Talk<\/td>\nUsing instant messages to explore workplace second language socialisation<\/td>\nThis presentation will explore the use of instant messaging to research second language socialisation among a dispersed community of postdoctoral academics.<\/p>\n

Drawing on the recent emergence of digital data collection in qualitative social investigation of potentially sensitive topics (e.g. Pearce, Thorgersen-Ntoumani & Duda, 2014; Dawson, Einion-Waller & Jones, 2021), my research uses instant messaging to explore the work experiences of a group of postdoctoral academics working in research and\/or teaching roles in UK higher education, for whom English is an additional language.<\/p>\n

The research is framed by second language socialisation, which typically explores how newcomers to a language community become competent participants in the practices of that community (Duff & Doherty, 2014) including its literacy practices.\u00a0 Much important research has focused on students and PhD candidates (e.g. Zappa-Hollman & Duff (2015), Anderson, 2017). Less is known about how learners employed in the language community of UK higher education, dispersed across multiple workplaces, become members of the academic professional community.<\/p>\n

Nine postdoctoral academics have downloaded the Signal app to their mobile phones and send a message the researcher when something happens in their work that is significant to them.\u00a0 Alongside the instant messages, participants are taking part in 3 semi-structured interviews over the 12-month data collection period.<\/p>\n

In the presentation, I will discussion my methodology and my choice of instant messaging as a data collection method.\u00a0 I will also discuss some implications of using this method: the relationship between researcher and participant, the data and how it compares with data from interview, and some practical considerations of instant messaging to collect qualitative data.<\/td>\n

Shamim Lindsay (Lancaster University, UK)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
January Monday 29th<\/sup> 4pm UK<\/td>\nTalk<\/td>\nAcademic literacies approach and quantitative methods are they anathema?<\/td>\nThe Lancaster Literacy Research group define their approach as focussing \u2018on the uses and meanings of reading and writing in different contexts and cultures\u2019 (Lancaster Literacy Research Centre. n.d). We suggest that our research is aligned to this perspective. It originates from our work with (student) writers and is informed by an academic literacies approach that also assumes that \u2018literacy practices [\u2026] are shaped by the context they are part of and by wider social, cultural, political and economic factors that impact on people\u2019s lives\u2019 (ibid).<\/p>\n

Somewhat surprising in this context, the work we present uses a quantitative approach, a choice that is usually associated with the assessment of writing performance (Weigle. 2002) through large-scale tests, such as IELTS or SATS,. Since these tests produce reliable judgements of texts written in an almost context-free vacuum, they are not compatible with our understanding of literacies, but does this exclude quantitative methods per se?<\/p>\n

In our presentation, we will explain why we began to work on this unusual methodology, how it works and what it can potentially inform the teaching of writing. We also outline what it can contribute to literacies research by challenging the traditional divide between quantitative methods and those that seek a more nuanced understanding of how people use discourses in specific contexts.<\/td>\n

Ursula Canton & Daniela Zahn (Glasgow Caledonian University)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
February<\/p>\n

Tuesday 27th<\/p>\n

4pm UK<\/td>\n

Reading discussion<\/td>\n<\/td>\nReading discussion based on the following article:<\/p>\n

Tuck, J. (2024). Defamiliarizing assessment and feedback: Exploring the potential of \u2018moments of engagement\u2019 to throw light on the marking of undergraduate assignments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(1), 72\u201385. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02602938.2023.2181942<\/a><\/p>\n

We will circulate a pdf nearer the time. The discussion will be followed by an interview with the author on March 4th, and should provoke some questions we can pose around learning, assessment and literacy in higher education.<\/td>\n

Facilitated by Soledad Montes Sanchez, Lancaster University and Denise de Pauw, University of Leeds, network convenors<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
March<\/p>\n

Tuesday 12th<\/p>\n

4pm UK<\/td>\n

Interview<\/td>\nConversation with Jackie Tuck, Open University, UK<\/td>\nThis will be an informal interview with special guest, Dr Jackie Tuck. Jackie is Senior Lecturer in English Language and Applied Linguistics at the Open University, and has over thirty years\u2019 experience as a teacher and lecturer in English Language, English Literature and Communication in a range of postcompulsory settings, including Higher, Further, Adult and Community Education, English as a Foreign Language and English for Academic Purposes. Her research interests focus on pedagogic practices around student writing, and she says, “By placing academic teachers, rather than student writers, at the centre of these enquiries, my work provides an in-depth focus on an under-researched area of higher education”. Her most recent projects investigate higher education marking practices.\u00a0 Read Jackie’s full online bio and view her list of publications here: https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/people\/jt75<\/a><\/td>\nFacilitated by<\/strong>: Soledad Montes Sanchez & Denise de Pauw (network convenors)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Previous sessions<\/strong><\/p>\n

SPRING\/SUMMER SCHEDULE 2023<\/strong><\/p>\n

Theme: Methodologies for literacies as social practice research <\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Throughout this new set of talks\/discussions, we would like to share our views, experiences, and current challenges around methodologies and methods, considering the broad diversity of methodological approaches and tools we might rely on (linguistic ethnography, case studies, longitudinal methods, and more). We hope to dive into the relationships between epistemology, methodologies, and methods and to explore how early career researchers and PHDs approach methodological choices and challenges.<\/p>\n

We have scheduled a series of interconnected talks, reading discussions and one interview with Karin Tusting, Professor at the Department of Linguistics and English Language, editor of the Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography and convenor of BAAL Linguistic Ethnography forum.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Register: <\/strong>Please register as member here<\/a>. \u00a0Your registration will allow us to send you the meeting links, recordings, PDFs and any last minute updates.<\/p>\n

Time<\/strong>: 4pm or 3pm UK time (see the exact time for each session in the table below).<\/p>\n

Are you interested in sharing your work in progress, or leading a text-based discussion for us later in the academic year?<\/strong> Drop us an email at s.montessanchez@lancaster.ac.uk<\/a> or d.b.depauw@leeds.ac.uk<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/td>\nSession format<\/td>\nTitle<\/td>\nReading\/ Presentation abstract<\/td>\nFacilitator\/Speaker\/ Interviewee<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Monday 17th<\/sup> April<\/p>\n

3pm (UK time)<\/td>\n

Talk<\/td>\nLet\u2019s talk: a practitioner researcher\u2019s account of developing adult literacy curricula<\/td>\nThere is a disconnect between the current standards for Functional Skills English in the UK, and adult learners’ motivations for joining programmes. \u00a0Considering literacy as a social practice instead, my study focuses on a cohort of adult literacy learners in England, and their motivations for returning to learning. I consider how their everyday experience can help influence adult literacy curriculum development, in my teaching setting of further and adult education.<\/p>\n

My approach is in\u00a0the action-research ethnographic tradition.\u00a0Using narrative enquiry, I had therefore identified\u00a0methods such as interviews and collecting stories of experience as useful data on the everyday lives of my cohort of learners. \u00a0As the study has developed,\u00a0the narrative enquiry approach focused my study further, highlighting the important role adult education can offer for adults to \u2018restory\u2019 <\/em>themselves and their experiences of education.<\/p>\n

Key topics: Literacy as social practice, research in practice, narrative enquiry<\/em><\/td>\n

Kerry Scattergood, Solihull College & University Centre (UK)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Monday 22nd <\/sup>May<\/p>\n

4pm (UK time)<\/td>\n

Talk<\/td>\nThe discursive construction of academic identity through writing as an intercultural process in early career researchers<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

In this presentation, I will introduce my proposed PhD research project, which examines how the discursive construction of identities through writing relates to patterns of privilege within the academic community. To better understand this complex issue, the project will focus on a specific group of researchers in training who are part of a larger transnational and interinstitutional research project funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Through this case study, I aim to shed light on how early career researchers construct their identities in academic writing, and how this process is influenced by their individual and collective cultural backgrounds. The methodological design is qualitative, diachronic, ethnographic, collaborative, and reflexive. By using a range of tools, such as literacy histories, conversations around text, and inter-learning workshops, I hope to generate inter-learning processes that promote participatory data analysis and problematize traditional researcher-object relationships. Ultimately, this research aims to contribute valuable insights to the critical aspects of researcher training, focusing on providing new avenues for thinking about how to promote greater equity and inclusivity within the academic community.<\/td>\nJesica Franco, Universidad Veracruzana (M\u00e9xico)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Monday 19th <\/sup>June 4pm (UK time)<\/td>\nTalk<\/td>\nEditing as methodology for literacy research: an intercultural approach<\/td>\nIn this presentation, I describe a fragment of the methodological design of a research project on the authorial formation of educational researchers. The methodology is an exploratory proposal that uses editing as an analytical strategy to investigate the role of authors within their communities of study. In this process, I propose a series of debates and possible contributions to study authorial formation from the role of the editor<\/td>\nCarlos Rojas-Ram\u00edrez, Academia de Lectura y Escritura, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, M\u00e9xico<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Monday 3rd July, 4pm (UK time)<\/td>\nReading discussion<\/td>\n<\/td>\nReading:<\/u> Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and “Deep Theorizing”: Closing the Gap Between Text and Context in Academic Writing Research, Written Communication, <\/em>25(3), 53-388.<\/td>\nDenise De Pauw & Soledad Montes (Lancaster University)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Monday July 17th<\/sup><\/p>\n

4pm (UK time)<\/td>\n

Interview<\/td>\n<\/td>\nInterviewee biography: <\/u><\/p>\n

Karin Tusting is a full professor at the Department of Linguistics and English Language, Lancaster University, and co-director of the Lancaster Literacy Research Centre. Her research has been predominantly in the areas of literacy studies and linguistic ethnography, with particular interests in workplace writing practices, literacies in organizations, and literacy and identity. She has recently published Academics writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation (Routledge 2019), co-written with Sharon McCulloch, Ibrar Bhatt, Mary Hamilton and David Barton, and edited the Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography (2020).<\/td>\n

Karin Tusting (Lancaster University)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

AUTUMN SCHEDULE 2022 <\/strong><\/p>\n

Theme: Decolonizing literacy education: multilingualism, translanguaging, and multiculturalism<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n
Following on from a very wide-ranging series of talks in 2021-22, this autumn, we plan to follow a dedicated theme, which is loosely based on social practices and linguistic repertoires, in relation to power, ideologies, and decolonization. In the upcoming months, we have scheduled a series of interconnected talks on work in progress, combined with discussions on texts chosen by members who will also be facilitating those discussions. We hope that you\u2019ll find time to read the highlights of any chosen text, to benefit from active participation in discussions, but if not, don\u2019t worry – you\u2019re still welcome to attend and contribute!<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Register: <\/strong>please register as a member here.<\/a>\u00a0 Your registration will allow us to share readings PDFs and any last minute changes to our schedule with you.<\/p>\n

Are you interested in sharing your work in progress, or leading a text-based discussion for us later in the academic year?<\/strong> Drop us an email at s.montessanchez@lancaster.ac.uk<\/a> or d.b.depauw@leeds.ac.uk<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date<\/td>\nSession format<\/td>\nTitle<\/td>\nReading\/<\/p>\n

Presentation abstract<\/td>\n

Facilitator\/<\/p>\n

Speaker<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 3rd October<\/td>\nDiscussion<\/td>\nMulticulturality in higher education<\/td>\nReading:<\/u> Gunther Dietz (2009) Intercultural universities in Mexico: empowering indigenous peoples or mainstreaming multiculturalism?, 20(1), 1-4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14675980802700623<\/a><\/td>\nJesica Franco & Carlos Rojas, Universidad Veracruzana, M\u00e9xico<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Monday 17th<\/sup> October<\/td>\nPresentation<\/td>\nTranslanguaging through immigrant languages: Disrupting the monolingual practices in primary school premises<\/td>\nAbstract:<\/u> The aim of this study was to investigate the use of translanguaging in transforming learning spaces for immigrants from African countries who are in South Africa. The South-South immigration situation in which complex linguistic environments are created has become a norm in South African classrooms. It is because of these super diverse linguistic spaces that research has called for the redress of teaching pedagogy that suits the current linguistic status quo in educational institutions. In this research, I, therefore, incorporate the translanguaging theory, Decolonisation theory, and Bakhtin\u2019s heteroglossia to address the immigrant languaging practices.I use a qualitative research design and conduct 15 multilingual tutorials (Lessons) with 30 immigrant learners and 4 teachers. The results showed that translanguaging was a more effective pedagogy in creating a dialogue between the learners and their teachers and everyone was able to bring knowledge from elsewhere, including the home. The learners felt comfortable and rightfully placed in the multilingual tutorial as they were able to exhibit their linguistic identities and practice their beingness. Translanguaging can be a useful tool for learner integration, and it is also important to enhance teacher expertise in order to meet the 21st multilingual complexity which includes immigrant languages. The traditional methodologies seem not to match the current linguistic needs of the classrooms.<\/td>\nClarah Dhokotera, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 14th <\/sup>November<\/td>\nDiscussion<\/td>\nApplied linguistics from the global south<\/td>\nReading:<\/u> Pennycook, A. & Makoni, S. (2020). Introduction: Gazing from the South. In K. Hyland (Ed.) Innovations and challenges in applied linguistics from the global south<\/em>. Routledge.<\/p>\n

*We will send this PDF to those registered in our mail list here.<\/a><\/td>\n

Lisa Treffry-Goatley, University of Cape Town, South Africa.<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 5th<\/sup> December<\/td>\nDiscussion<\/td>\nRethinking English as Lingua Franca<\/td>\nReading:<\/u> Navarro, F., Lillis, T., Donahue, T., Curry, M. J., \u00c1vila Reyes, N., Gustafsson, M., Zavala, V., Laur\u00eda, D., Lukin, A., McKinney, C., Feng, H., & Motta-Roth, D. (2022). Rethinking English as a lingua franca in scientific-academic contexts. A position statement. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 3(1), 143-153. Link to the text in 5 languages:<\/u> https:\/\/www.escriturayaprendizaje.cl\/elf<\/a><\/p>\n

Complementary reading: <\/u>Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing and the myth of linguistic injustice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 58-69.<\/td>\n

Soledad Montes &<\/p>\n

Denise de Pauw, Lancaster University.<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Friday 24th<\/sup> February at 4 pm UK (1 pm Rio)<\/td>\nPresentation<\/td>\nResearching literacy as protest in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro<\/td>\nAbstract:<\/u> How does literacy inform protest and vice versa during acute periods of social change? In this talk for the ECR Network, I discuss this question drawing on work from, and work-in-progress developing on my recent monograph \u2013 Researching Protest Literacies: Literacy as Protest in the Favelas of Rio de Janeiro (Routledge, 2021).<\/p>\n

To begin, I briefly review this long-term ethnographic study\u2019s settings, methods, and theoretical framework for researching literacy and protest based on the New Literacy Studies, Social Movement Studies, and related areas. After, I propose an addition to this RPL framework by introducing a set of concepts drawn from South American social movement studies on the anthropology of time. Work on communication and protesting has tended to focus on spatial practices more than temporal \u2013 I suggest ways to add to the later through this anthropological perspective.<\/p>\n

Based on the above, I then present a work-in-progress analysis of two incidents overviewed in my book which call for further consideration: i) a text trajectory through which favela social movements assert a differentiated socio-political positioning during a historic period of mass protests in Brazil; ii) a repertoire of social movement communicational practices mobilized in response to a controversial Brazilian Army occupation of a set of favelas. Lastly, I discuss examples and raise questions regarding informal and non-formal learning in and around protest events and social movements.<\/span><\/td>\n

Jamie Duncan, Lancaster University (based in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

============================<\/p>\n

Previous talks:<\/p>\n

SUMMER SCHEDULE 2022<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Date\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nSpeaker\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0Presentation details\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Monday 23th<\/sup>\u00a0May<\/td>\nCarlos Rojas, Universidad Veracruzana, M\u00e9xico<\/td>\nTitle: Becoming an educational researcher: an autoethnographic and intercultural approach\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Abstract: In this presentation, I will describe and analyse the literacy development of a group of educational researchers in Mexico that aim to frame a community. First, I will share some personal reflections based on my own locus of enunciation and positionality as a researcher. Particularly, I will focus on the selection of this community, the alienation needed to distance myself from their epistemological culture, the place of randomness in this process, and some meanings of the writing process itself. I will describe the methodological design that combines an autoethnographic perspective and contemporary art. This approach allowed me to identify contrasting appropriations of the educative discourse through its text diversity, genres, and writing styles. Finally, I will share some findings and preliminary conclusions about the different phases of literacy development based on its political, historical, and economic conditions.\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 27th<\/sup>\u00a0June<\/td>\nLisa Treffry-Goatley<\/p>\n

University of Cape Town, South Africa<\/td>\n

Title: Multilingual children at their local library: some preliminary data from two public libraries in South Africa and Kenya\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

My research into children\u2019s literacy practices is motivated by my work in educational publishing for multilingual African contexts and a keen interest in qualitative engagement with children representing a diversity of bi\/multilingual experiences. In addition to deepening scholars\u2019 understanding of learners with multiple linguistic proficiencies, such engagements also create space to review and possibly invigorate normative\/dominant theories about literacy and language.The results of standardised literacy assessments are often conveyed in terms of a discourse of deficit concerning representations of bi\/multilingual young people from socio-economically marginalised contexts, especially in the global South. I would like to offer a richer and more nuanced picture of multilingual African children\u2019s language and literacy repertoires, while also addressing the issue of how such children continue to be systemically marginalised through language hegemony and social injustice. In this presentation I will share some of my emerging findings from ethnographic fieldwork with children at two public libraries, in socio-economically marginalised areas of urban Kenya and South Africa. My focus during the library fieldwork was the activities of children as regards their language(ing) and literacy practices in general, but particularly engaging with primary school-aged children about language, reading\/viewing practices, and reading materials.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 25th<\/sup>\u00a0July<\/td>\nPingping Xie, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland<\/td>\nTitle: Translanguaging practices in online chat as language learning opportunities: A Study of Chinese University Learners\u2019 WeChat Use\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Abstract: In this presentation, I will discuss insights based on preliminary analysis of my PhD project, which examines online translanguaging practices of Chinese university students who are sojourning in the UK. By adopting literacy as social practice as the theoretical framework, I will review how Chinese international students take advantage of networking opportunities when they are studying in the UK and how they treat social events as language learning opportunities, especially regarding their translanguaging practices on social media.This study adopts a mixed-methods approach. A baseline survey is conducted first, then followed by a collection of posts & chat logs of WeChat, and techno-biographic interviews, to investigate how technology and social media have affected Chinese students\u2019 literacy practices online and study experience. How transitions over time vary and how language is learned and conducted in the informal digital context can affect students\u2019 language learning and study practices. For this discussion, I intend to share a preliminary analysis with the audience and engage in a conversation on how my results could inform us about how the translanguaging practices of Chinese international students’ innovative forms of “networked language learning” cross the boundaries of social and educational life.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Spring 2022 schedule<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

We are pleased to open new work in progress<\/strong> discussions!<\/strong><\/p>\n

See our list of presentations + discussions below<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Monday 14th\u00a0February 2022<\/p>\n

4pm (U.K. time)<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Mar\u00edlia\u00a0Camponogara Torres<\/p>\n

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (Brazil)<\/td>\n

 <\/p>\n

Presentation: <\/strong><\/p>\n

Negotiating voice: An ethnographic academic writing study in a postgraduate multilingual context<\/strong><\/p>\n

REGISTRATION LINK<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

In this talk, I will explore some of my perceptions on how students negotiate their voice in the context of a postgraduate multilingual program in Brazil. First, I will briefly discuss what I have been reading about voice through a sociocultural lens (Canagarajah & Matsumoto, 2016; Ivanic & Camps, 2001; Hyland, 2008). Second, I will present my context of investigation and the methodology that I am employing to conduct my data collection and analysis. Finally, I will discuss some of my initial findings on students\u2019 voice while writing their master\u2019s thesis.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 14th <\/sup>March 2022<\/p>\n

4.30 pm (U.K. time)<\/td>\n

Samia Zayed<\/p>\n

Western University
\nCanada<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

A Comparative Case Study of the Teacher\u2019s Role in Curriculum-Making: Teacher Agency, Relationships and Curriculum<\/strong><\/p>\n

REGISTRATION LINK<\/strong>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

Research (Min 2019; Poullton 2020; Priestley et al., 2015; Priestley et al., 2021) indicates curricula’ positive effects and outcomes that explicitly support teacher agency in curriculum making. Recent curriculum policies in many different countries, including Scotland, Australia, and Brazil, have acknowledged teachers as agents of change (Goodson, 2003; Nieveen, 2011; Lennert da Silva and Molstad, 2020; Poulton 2020; Priestley, 2012; Priestley et al., 2015) suggesting the importance of teachers having a role in curriculum development. This teacher view comes after decades of policy de-professionalizing teachers through prescriptive curricula and standardized testing (Priestley et al., 2013). These recent moves to encourage teachers to contribute to curriculum development effectively and reform imply instituting a bottom-up curriculum approach that centers teachers in the curriculum-making process. The literature related to the ecological model of teacher agency (Priestley et al. 2015) indicates that programmatic curricula are important to supporting teacher agency and can be considered as part of a complex cluster of other individuals, social, cultural, and material dimensions that enable\/disable teacher agency. Unfortunately, not all curricular policies support teacher agency.<\/p>\n

My teaching experience in Libya, the findings of my master\u2019s research, and my new learning experience in Canada (Ph.D. courses and seminars) have all given rise to the specific focus of my Ph.D. dissertation (teacher agency, relationships, and curriculum). These factors are also motivating me to want to initiate cross-academic cultural information exchange and appreciation. Specifically, my study seeks to understand the role of professional relationships in teachers\u2019 agency and how these relations may or may not be impacted by the programmatic and institutional curriculum in two different contexts (Canada and Libya) using mutable data sources (interview and document analysis).<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 18th <\/sup>April\u00a02022<\/p>\n

4.30 pm (U.K. time)<\/td>\n

Jesica Franco<\/p>\n

Universidad\u00a0Veracruzana<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n

Presentation:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Reading and Writing Conceptions in a Graduate Program in Architecture in Mexico<\/strong><\/p>\n

REGISTRATION LINK<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

In this talk, I will present the results of a research study carried out in a graduate program in Architecture, in a public university in Mexico. The objective of the study was to describe the conceptions that teachers and students hold in relation to academic reading and writing. In order to achieve this, I adopted a plurimethodical perspective and divided the study into two phases. In phase one, I applied a self-administered questionnaire with open-ended questions to explore the conceptions and determine key actors. In phase two, I conducted interviews with teachers and students. The results, consistent with other research, verify that conceptions are not presented as opposites in the same person, but there is a greater proportion of one or the other. Thus, those who have a greater proportion of transmissive conceptions understand that reading and writing are processes of encoding and decoding written messages, which are used to obtain or transmit information. That is, reading and writing are conceived as general tools that can be used in any context. On the contrary, those whose conceptions are mostly transactional conceive reading and writing as dialogic, creative and meaning-building processes that are used to think (analyse, question, problematize), transform one’s own thinking and form one’s own criteria.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Autumn 2021 schedule<\/span>\ue740<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Monday\u00a015th<\/sup><\/p>\n

November\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

4pm (U.K. time)<\/td>\n

Ana Cort\u00e9s<\/p>\n

Syracuse University (USA)<\/td>\n

Presentation<\/strong><\/p>\n

A life in boxes: tracing the informed consent genre inside CVD’s archive<\/strong><\/p>\n

Teams LINK<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

In this presentation I will share some of my findings and challenges in trying to bring archival material to life to understand the literate practices of a vaccine research center located in Santiago de Chile. This work is part of my dissertation project and looks specifically into the informed consent and how it is located and contextualized within the larger genre ecology of the research project. Through intertextual analysis, I locate the informed consent at three moments in the research project: the protocol design; the application of consent with participants; and the re-visions following the emergence of serious adverse events. What this analysis suggests is that the informed consent is not a form, but an ongoing process, distributed across multiple moments, actors, and actions, that runs throughout the whole research. This invites reflections on the nature of written genres and reinforces the importance of studying literacies ecologically.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday\u00a013th<\/sup>\u00a0\u00a0December<\/p>\n

4pm (U.K. time)<\/td>\n

Research Group\u00a0coordinators<\/td>\nSocial meeting<\/strong><\/p>\n

Teams LINK<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

This meeting is a social encounter with members. We will\u00a0bring a topic of discussion\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0the practice of research\u00a0in literacy studies.\u00a0This\u00a0will be\u00a0a fantastic opportunity\u00a0to get to know other members and make relevant contacts with those\u00a0with similar research interests.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Monday 17th<\/sup>\u00a0January\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

4pm (U.K. time)<\/td>\n

Soledad Montes<\/p>\n

Lancaster\u00a0University<\/td>\n

Presentation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Students’<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>writing<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>from<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>an emic perspective:<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>talking around text interviews<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>as a<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>methodological<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>and theoretical<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong>option<\/strong><\/p>\n

Teams LINK<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

In this presentation,\u00a0I will share the process of analysis of 10 \u201ctalking around text interviews\u201d (Lillis, 2008, 2001; Ivanic, 1998)\u00a0with\u00a0Chilean students from\u00a0schools\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0high index of economic vulnerability (according to the Ministry of Education\u00a0of Chile, 2021).\u00a0In this analysis,\u00a0I pay attention to students\u2019\u00a0perspectives on their own writing practices and\u00a0their\u00a0choices\u00a0of meaning-making through texts. I also look\u00a0at\u00a0how texts are mediated by artifacts and technologies that play a role in\u00a0students’ transitions to further education.\u00a0Finally, I will discuss the \u201ctalking around text\u201d method \u2013and the theory behind it\u2013 to reflect on the role of students’ perspectives in the study of writing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jan to April 2025 SCHEDULE Theme:\u00a0Local literacies as social practice In this upcoming series, we will explore key ideas and contributions of Barton\u2019s work in literacy studies through a reading discussion followed by a conversation with Dr. Uta Papen (Lancaster University). Next, we will discuss ethnography and reflexivity in literacy research with Dr. Gunther Dietz…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":61,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1189","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/P83XGs-jb","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1189","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/61"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1189"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1189\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1251,"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1189\/revisions\/1251"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.lancs.ac.uk\/literacy-research-centre\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1189"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}