Results of this independent review of the future operation of the REF were issued on 28/07/16. The review examines how university research funding can be allocated more efficiently so that universities can focus on carrying out world-leading research.
The full report can be found here.
This is an opinion piece reflecting on my experiences so far of advocating ORCID iDs.
We recently started a concerted effort to implement and advocate the adoption of ORCID iDs at Lancaster University. By watching the adoption of ORCID grow among universities, publishers, funders and open science/access enthusiasts, and understanding the benefits it appeared to offer, it suddenly seemed inevitable.
It seemed, from my point of view, that we moved rapidly beyond talking about it as an interesting and potentially useful ‘thing’ that researchers can use if they like, to gaining strong backing from Associate Deans for Research and relevant Heads of Service. A field for adding ORCID iDs was quickly added to Pure, with a Pure to ORCID synchronisation following soon after.
At this point, advocacy for large scale adoption has started. I have been sold on the benefits in theory for a while. Who in the business hasn’t encountered the problem of name ambiguity when trying to match authors with publications? Whether you are searching the literature, building a citation overview, a CV or submitting a list of prior publications, this bit is a pain. If there was a way to use ORCID iDs as some sort of authority register, and push and pull that data (or a subset of it) into different systems, then that would be great.
However, I’ve perceived a few problems in this first period of advocacy. Whether the problem is in the message or in the technology, I’m not certain. I expect these problems will be ironed out by continuous development, and use cases.
The Library held its first ORCiD claimathon on 20th May 2016. Tanya Williamson gave an introduction to ORCiD, after which there was an opportunity to claim your own ORCiD. There were just three attendees but it was a great opportunity to discuss some of the benefits and challenges researchers were encountering.
One researcher could see the benefit due to his popular surname. Issues raised included the researcher’s identity on the HR system not being in sync with the Pure record; another was unable to tell if he had already created an ORCiD when trying to claim an ID through Pure; and email notifications will be sent on a daily and weekly basis (as Pure updates ORCiD daily) unless people turn off their inbox activity in ORCiD.
A prize of a personalised ORCiD mug was awarded to one lucky attendee.
There’ll be another ORCiD workshop on 28th June at 10am in C130, The Library.
Hi there! This blog has been created by staff at Lancaster University Library who are working in the broad area of Research Support. We have job titles like ‘librarian’, ‘repository manager’, ‘digital archivist’ and ‘open access manager’. We’ll introduce ourselves as and when.
We’d like to share the projects we’re working on, service developments, and thoughts on all things highly relevant to research support in the academic library sector.
Expect to see posts on topics such as (but not limited to):
Comments welcome.
